the random ponderings of e. f. danehy

wherein erin discusses writing & young adult fantasy (using much parenthetical commentary & tangential ramblings).

Category: media

Star Wars, Inception, and how a small child made my brain hurt.

Wednesday July 21, 2010

First of all, kids are brilliant. Especially curious, thirsty kids who ask a dozen questions a minute. I was one of those kids, and in every child-related job I’ve had I’ve worked with kids who are like that. I enjoy answering questions with as much patience, honesty, and thoroughness as I can muster.

But this can become complicated. It’s also led to some fascinating discussions with four, five, and six year olds. This discussion one called into question why I love Star Wars and why Inception is too complicated to be a kids’ movie. (Don’t worry, there are no spoilers.) Pretty heady for a five-minute conversation with a small child.

The six-year-old: “Monsters vs. Aliens is probably my favorite movie ever. Ever, ever. Well, maybe Cars, but that didn’t have monsters or aliens. What’s yours?”

Star Wars.” I paused, wondering at my automatic response. Is Star Wars my favorite movie? I’ve certainly seen it enough to quote it — but by that criteria, I can also rank Raiders of the Lost Ark and Back to the Future up there with Star Wars. (All right, I admit it: the accompanying films in their respective trilogies, too, though I have Opinions about them.) What other criteria are there? A movie I would willingly watch on repeat all day long? (Under that category I can add most Disney and/or Pixar animated films; every Miyazaki film; a handful of Oscar nominated films of the last fifteen years and The Sound of Music; a handful of record-breaking blockbusters both of the critically-acclaimed and the revel-in-the-mediocrity variety.)

“Yeah,” I said, “Star Wars.”

“So why do you like Star Wars so much?” he asked. He knows exactly what movie I’m talking about although he’s never seen it. His friends have Clone Wars backpacks. He has a Star Wars: Heroes and Villains Young Reader book. He went to a birthday party where the theme was Star Wars and he brought home a lightsaber as his goody-bag prize. He knows who Luke Skywalker and Darth Vader are. He understands Jedi and Sith. But he has never seen this movie.

“Luke is a farm boy who becomes a hero by rescuing a princess, eluding Darth Vader, destroying the Death Star, and saving the galaxy.” Another pause. Not only did I just give an example of Joseph Campbell‘s hero theory in a happy nutshell, but that same plot is also that of a ton of books and movies (just substitute different nouns).

He stared at me, skeptically, as if to say, “That’s all? Lame.”

I found myself compelled to add, “It’s not just the story. The characters are memorable, the action is great, and there are spaceships, blasters, lightsaber fights, and a really awesome world. It’s got the whole package.”

As I said this, I realized that part of the entire reason I love Star Wars is because it started what became a phenomenon, spawning sequels, prequels, merchandise, books (so many books!), video games — it’s a part of culture, a nerdy subset of American media culture that has influenced a generation (or two, by now) and helped pave the way for better technologies (ILM, THX, Skywalker Sound) that have influenced the way film and media have evolved in the past three decades. Not to mention Star Wars’ pop culture influences. (Just look at the Wikipedia articles.) So it’s not simply the first movie, or the first trilogy, but the entire technological and cultural phenomenon of Star Wars that makes it something I love, something I value and appreciate. I can no longer separate Star Wars the single film from Star Wars the cultural beast. As I realized this, I also realized that while I can admit the original Star Wars isn’t stylistically or artistically the best movie I’ve ever seen (and let’s not discuss the prequels, mmkay?), I can’t separate the film from the context of its time and its place in cinema history. It’s like trying to separate Dickens from nineteenth century London, or New York from its skyscrapers. For a fan of science fiction and fantasy, it’s impossible to separate Star Wars from the consciousness of American media and culture.

I think, at this point, the six-year-old was wondering why I was looking so lost. I was having something of a revelation — Do I love Star Wars because of what it represents more than the film itself? How can I even answer that? — but of course all he saw was a blank look. I have a tendency to get lost in my head and I think by now this six-year-old understands that.

“Oh, okay,” he said. His question had been answered to his satisfaction. “So what was the last movie you saw?”

Inception,” I said. Without really thinking. Why do I do that?

He frowned. “What does that word mean?”

“Well. In the movie, the ‘inception’ is the idea of planting an idea in someone else’s head. In their dreams.”

“Did you like that movie?”

“Yes. A lot.”

“Why isn’t that movie your favorite movie, then?”

I stalled. That’s actually a good question, I thought. Stylistically, aesthetically, in terms of the effects and the vision, it was pretty excellent. Is it too new to be in my top favorites? Is it too controversial? In the days since, I have read quite a few reviews about it. I’m still wondering what to think, how to interpret it. I kept guessing throughout the movie, throwing my theories against the inside wall of my brain only to see the plot shoot them down later in the film. In a word, though, it was brilliant. “I don’t know. I’ve only seen it once,” I said.

“So it’s about dreams,” he said, going back to what I’d said earlier — did I mention he’s a very smart kid? — “dreaming and ideas?”

“Yep.” And, because I had only just seen it that same morning and I was still itching to talk about it to someone, I added, “It’s about what happens if people can go inside other people’s dreams and change them.”

He grinned. “Oh! It’s a kids’ movie!”

“Oh. No. It’s not.”

“But it’s about going inside other people’s dreams. That’s cool. That could be a kids’ movie.”

I imagined, for a moment, Inception as a kids’ movie and had a wild notion of kids playing with dreamscapes and getting in trouble. Star Wars, I thought, is something of a kids’ movie. But not Inception. Could I explain it to him somehow? Then I recalled the time when the six-year-old, at age five, asked me to explain multiplication and division to him. He’s a math whiz, so I did. I struggled to conceptualize it in a visual way for him to understand. Explaining about dividing apples among children as my example, he understood the principle of division — but didn’t want to try it in practice. (He was five. That’s okay.) Multiplication, though. That was hard. So to explain the complexity of this film to a young audience? One would have to be terrifically gifted or terrifically crazy.

“Maybe. But this one isn’t. It’s too complicated.”

“Too complicated how? You can explain it! Come on, come on, please?”

I really wanted to find a way to level with him, that impulse of being straight and honest with all kids as much as I can. But sometimes, it’s better just to give the simple answer. “I can’t explain it. Why don’t you go set up a game to play?”

“PLEASE!”

I sighed, seeing the look. The I-won’t-give-this-up-because-I-need-to-know-PLEASE-tell-me look. “It’s not a kids’ movie because it’s a grown-up movie. Okay? That’s just what it is.” Christopher Nolan, I thought, you have just made me give a blow-off answer to a small child because of your dastardly fascinating film. Why couldn’t Inception’s plot have been as simple as Star Wars’? But then, I wondered, would I have loved Inception so much had it been simple — would anyone have loved it? Its beauty is in its complexity, as perhaps Star Wars‘ is in its simplicity.

“Aw, okay, fine,” he muttered, then went to set up Connect Four.

Kids these days, I tell you. They make my brain hurt.

Erin and eBooks!

Tuesday June 8, 2010

People know me as a big reader and writer. My friends, my family. So I’ve been asked a number of times what I think about this whole “eBook thing.” The sudden trend toward Kindles, Nooks, Sony Readers, iPads, etc, for the purpose of reading books and other media. Which would I recommend (because I must know!), which is better? (I don’t know!) What do I, as a huge consumer of the written word, like or not like about them? (Many things, good and bad, from a distant perspective.) Would I ever consider self-publishing directly to eBook? (No.) But had I ever actually sat and read a book on an eReader? (Nope.)

Well. Not until yesterday.

Yesterday I was on the L train, where the ambient subway noise is so loud under the East River that I usually have to pause or turn up my audiobook or music in my headphones. But brilliantly, I forgot my headphones yesterday. Neither did I remember to bring my stalwart mass market emergency paperback (usually something I’ve already read) in its little fabric protective cover (for both subway privacy — I can’t stand people being nosy! — and for protection in my backpack). So I was without a way to amuse myself for my commute. My commute isn’t an “easy” one, either: it’s 10 minutes on the L, 5-10 minutes of waiting at the next platform, then 10-15 minutes on the ancient, creaking, and loud C train. Meaning, I can’t snuggle into a plastic seat and read for a good forty minutes. It’s all starts and stops. Half of the time when I am listening to an audiobook, I have to have it paused for at least half if not more of the commute simply because the extra noise is too deafening. (But I never “read” an audiobook for the first time, I always read it first, then listen to it if I can get it from the library or online, to read it again.) Not only are the subways themselves loud, but the platforms are loud (every time any train, even the ones going in the other direction across the way, pulls into the station, it’s all screeches and creaks). So I end up either not hearing half the book or getting annoyed that I have no distraction. Thus, reading is usually my preferred distraction. I can still hear when a train is coming without actually having to stop what I’m doing. I prefer reading during the brief stretches of inactivity throughout the day, too. When I’m on the bus, or when I’m sitting on a park bench, I enjoy being able to pull out a book and dig right in.

Getting back to the point, I pulled out my iPhone while on the L. I browsed through my apps, thinking maybe I’d play a game. Then I realized I had downloaded the Barnes & Noble eReader app because I’d gotten a bunch of free downloads the other day from their website. I started playing with it and opened up Robin Hobb’s Dragon Keeper, which I also own in hardcover but haven’t gotten around to yet. I tweaked the font, size, and page animation, then got to reading. The L stopped, I locked the iPhone and shoved it in my pocket, darted between slow folks up the stairs, then settled on the C platform to wait. I pulled out the iPhone again, and I was still on that same page in the eBook. I kept reading. I read as I walked. I read as I waited later in the day. I sat on a bench in the sunshine in Central Park idly watching the small children play as I continued to read. When someone required my attention — lock. iPhone in the pocket. “Yes?” Done, I pulled it out again, and kept reading. I read a good third of the book across the course of the day. (Helped in part by my ability to simply lock the iPhone and throw it in my pocket when I needed to pay attention to the real world.)

I was so impressed.

I’ve disliked the idea of eBooks from the start because I am one of those people who loves getting ink on my fingers when I tear through a brand new paperback the day of its release. (I get ink on my thumbs and left pinky, from the way I alternately hold it with my left hand or with both hands.) I love seeing my bookshelves lined with colorful spines of much-read books. I love seeing that I have a complete series on my shelf, next to other series. I love the idea of being able to thumb through the pages and find that quick-reference scene or sentence I was trying to quote from one of my dog-eared favorites. I geeked out when I went to a rare book room and got to touch an original version of David Copperfield by Charles Dickens, in the compiled serialized format of its first publication. (I don’t even like Dickens and I was geeking out!) I’ve held a page of the Gutenberg Bible printed hundreds of years ago! (GEEK OUT.) I am a book person!

But yesterday was the first time I could see myself, say, reading an eBook on the iPad and loving it. Or simply reading more eBooks on my iPhone — though admittedly it’s a small screen with terrible battery life economy! I found, despite my love of the feel of pages in my hand, that I really enjoyed the idea of a book on the go. Even more on the go than a book by definition already is. Scary, that.

It felt, oddly, as I felt when I first transitioned to an .mp3 player, when music used to be about having that collection of discs in that folder and carrying that with your CD player, or remembering to throw the right disc into the CD player before going to the gym or the track. How many times did I open my CD player to find I’d remembered the wrong CD! That’s… obsolete now. It’s all loaded on my iPod, my iPhone. If I forgot to update it lately, that’s terrible, but I don’t have the choice of 13 tracks, I have thousands. But I think about the way that music’s shift to digital has changed my life and I try to transpose that to books… books… ah! But see, I don’t want books to go the way of diskettes and vinyl. I don’t want to see magazines and newspapers become entirely digitized. One of my friends, an iPad user, showed me the Wall Street Journal’s iPad app. Embedded videos! Searchable keywords! It makes getting the paper version delivered somewhat silly. But I think: as a teenager I ripped pictures of hot guys out of magazines and taped them to my walls. Will my children copy-and-paste them to their laptop desktops — to their touch-screen digital crazy devices? I see digital photo frames in homes, with scrolling slideshows of family vacations, and wonder where photo albums and scrapbooks have gone. No doubt the digital age has made information safer and more easily accessible — no running into a burning house to save the photos when there are backups stored online — but it’s not… tangible. Not in the same way. That was and still is my big question mark about eBooks. How will it change the way we read, the way we consume books and other media?

Two days ago I could have said I’d never read an eBook and I wasn’t certain I’d like the experience if I tried. Today I can say that while I did pick up the hardcover version of Robin Hobb’s Dragon Keeper (which is excellent so far) when I was home and able to pull it off the shelf, I am planning to read more of it today digitally. This experience has made me curious about eReaders in a way I haven’t been until now. I could have cared less, but now I’m thinking about it. Seriously. Ah! Someone pinch me.

My name is Erin and I’m a lurker.

Wednesday February 24, 2010

I admit it! I’m an lurker. A constant, avid lurker. This means I scroll through multiple outlets of social media including Twitter, Facebook, and several (dozen?) blogs on a regular basis, but I rarely (if ever) post in response to something, comment, or even @reply. Urban Dictionary has some interesting definitions for it, many of which apply to me.

I’m embarrassed!

I’m one of the only twenty-somethings I know who’s relatively shy about social media and meeting people via the medium of the internet. The weird thing is, this seems a bit off for my generation. I’m old enough to remember the Time Before the Internet but too young to have done much phone conversing with friends as a teen/college student — not when there was the beauty, speed, and simplicity of instant messaging, emails, chats, and social websites. (Though I’m too old to be an avid texter. Texts confuse me, mostly, and I am yet again ashamed to admit that.) So because of this, I have absolutely no qualms about lurking about the internet, checking up on friends and learning about new people.

In real life, however, I’m completely different. I can’t sit in a group of people I vaguely know and stay quiet (or at least, not for long). I’m probably too outgoing, sometimes — in that nerdy-awkward way — and when I describe myself as shy, many people who know me in real life laugh — laugh — because definitionally I’m not shy… except, apparently, when it comes to the internet.

Is this a bad thing, though? Perhaps. I follow and I have a really great sense of many people I’ve never met in real life via the medium, but because I don’t engage in a dialogue, they may not even realize I exist. But I’m also afraid, in this internet age of lower barriers to communication, of coming off as too pushy, crazy, or obsessive. (Which, admittedly, I know I may come off as if I really did throw myself into commenting to my heart’s content.) There’s a happy medium, and I’m sure I’ll ease into finding it, but I haven’t found it yet. Baby steps, they say, and that applies as much to this as to everything. I am trying, and I’ve been trying over the last few months, the last year, to really dig into the internet world. I’ll get there.

But until I ease myself into a more active internet social lifestyle, I’ll probably just keep lurking.

Baby steps. Baby steps.

Ponderings on Joss Whedon and writing for an audience

Saturday September 26, 2009

I’m a huge Joss Whedon fan and have been ever since Buffy the Vampire Slayer (the series) changed my pre-teen/teen life. (He’s continuously impressed/inspired me, most recently with his Emmy-winning Dr. Horrible’s Sing-Along Blog.) After last night’s excellent premiere of Dollhouse‘s second season, I was perusing the interwebs and came upon this interview Whedon did with the LA Times. My favorite little bit of it was:

You have quite a devoted following. As you write, do you consider what your fans will think? Is that a consideration?
It’s a consideration, but it’s not the first one. The first one is ‘What’s cool?’ If I think something is cool, then other people will too, because I’m a fan. Something that makes me go ‘Ohh, tingly,’ that’s something that other people will share. I am the audience. When you’re thinking about the fans, you’re more thinking about ‘What do we not have enough of?’ and ‘Where do we need to be next, emotionally?’ But beyond that, you’re thinking ‘What makes me excited, what’s wrong with me, and how cool is that?’ It’s a playground.
You also think about the actors. What will challenge them? What will jazz them? What haven’t I seen from them? It’s just all part of the same equation. The audience includes the people making it. Actually, I think the people making it and me might make up about half of the audience.

You have quite a devoted following. As you write, do you consider what your fans will think? Is that a consideration?

It’s a consideration, but it’s not the first one. The first one is ‘What’s cool?’ If I think something is cool, then other people will too, because I’m a fan. Something that makes me go ‘Ohh, tingly,’ that’s something that other people will share. I am the audience. When you’re thinking about the fans, you’re more thinking about ‘What do we not have enough of?’ and ‘Where do we need to be next, emotionally?’ But beyond that, you’re thinking ‘What makes me excited, what’s wrong with me, and how cool is that?’ It’s a playground.

What an energizing way to think of writing! As a playground. Obviously the medium of television is different from novels (or films, etc), but all writing reaches some kind of audience. But how conscious are all writers about that audience? How does that perception of the audience change as it grows from something vague (for a new writer) to a vocal group of devoted fans (for someone like Whedon)? I know some writers have added material, gone in new directions, or spurned input from fans when it comes to very popular media with devoted fan followings (e.g. the inclusion of fan-favorite details in the new trilogy of the Star Wars films). I like Whedon’s reaction: he’s not going to shape plots exclusively based on fan reaction, but at the same time, he’s a fan, too…

I’ve been told a few times that as long as you’re writing something that gets you excited and you’re having fun writing it, that eagerness and enthusiasm for the material will come through to your audience. It’s something I notice starkly with my non-fiction (especially in school): when I’m enthusiastic about the subject matter, the manner of voice and tone I adopt to write about it changes drastically from when I am ambivalent or apathetic on the topic. With fiction, the line is finer, and can sometimes vary from scene to scene, chapter to chapter. If one chapter’s writing is sharper, snappier, more exact than another’s, that’s a clear marker for me for revision. Every scene needs to matter to be in the book, but for it to qualify, it really needs to matter on a visceral level.

The bit I quoted struck me mostly because I’m always concerned about my audience — I’m incapable of writing anything without imagining even an amorphous audience. Often I find myself imagining my[precocious know-it-all of a twelve-year-old]self as my audience, but just as often I think of any number of people I know, or have known, reading it and responding to it differently. I’ve heard [a few] writers say they don’t care about what others think about their writing. To some degree, I write for myself, but I don’t only write for myself. I write for the girl I used to be, wanting a book like this to read. I write for the teenager I was, desperate for an enthralling fantasy. I write for every writing teacher I’ve ever had (and yes, I can almost hear their commentary as I edit, recalling what each of them taught me in their own ways). I write for librarians, I write for parents. I write for my family, for their reactions when they finally get the hands on the books I’ve been puttering around in for years. I write for people I’ve never met and may never meet, but who may one day pick up my book and be struck by it. I’m not really even conscious of this…but at the same time, I’m entirely conscious of it.

So what are your thoughts on this? How conscious are you about audience as you write? Does it change depending on your genre or specific project?

  • a random quote

    The world is governed more by appearances than realities, so that it is fully as necessary to seem to know something as to know it. — Daniel Webster

  • the latest updates

  • recent blog posts

  • a few random posts

  • blog post categories

  • blog post archives

  • the latest from some of the feeds I read