the random ponderings of e. f. danehy

wherein she discusses such things as writing, fantasy literature & criticism, & nerdy popular culture (using much parenthetical commentary & tangential ramblings).

Writing on the anniversary

Sunday March 7, 2010

I started a new short story (or novella? Ah!) set in one of my worlds last weekend. I’m a few thousand words in and I’m absolutely loving the feel of the world again. I set it in a familiar world to get excited about the idea of going back to revise one of the drafts set in the same world (at a different time, in a different place). Writing this is doing everything for my enthusiasm I hoped it would. Not only that, but I thought I’d had all of my big, necessary worldbuilding questions answered in regards to this world’s history and system(s) of magic, but apparently I don’t. Writing this story, with its vociferous narrator and her particular mindset, helped me to see that. I love when one story and its characters helps me with another.

The other fun and really exciting thing about this story is my narrator herself. She’s much edgier than the last main character I spent a significant amount of time with and the contrast is really thrilling. She’s so vastly different from me it’s both an excitement and a challenge to dig into her brain and look out from her eyes. (It may sound pretty gross, but I definitely do imagine myself as something of a leech in these characters’ heads when I’m writing first person. I’m weird but we knew that.)

In other news, it’s also my first wedding anniversary, the week of my sixth anniversary of being together, and it’s Oscar night. The anniversary(ies?) we celebrated with a lot of sushi on Friday and an obnoxiously huge steak to share last night. That steak made my life complete. (Who needs gluten when there’s steak? Carnivorous GF folks of the world, rejoice!) I should have photographed it, but considering the husband and I were starving, there wasn’t really any time to waste. (Also, my iPhone has no flash and you know restaurants with mood lighting that equates to shadowy darkness…) Both anniversaries sort of shocked us. I’m surprised it’s been a year since the wedding, and even more surprised that it’s been six years of us together. In a good way. But because we celebrated both Friday and Saturday, I’ve spent a lot of today writing and working. I’m also very excited about the Oscars (but less excited than I could be because I haven’t managed to see all of the nominated movies — though 10 is a lot to try to tackle before Oscar night!) and the whole shebang. The husband is less thrilled with my taking over the remote for a whole evening (as well as my decision to sit there and write between awards with the netbook on my lap) but then, Oscar night comes but once a year! As does our anniversary… but I think the steak counts as time well spent to celebrate each other. Right? Steak makes up for tonight being about Oscar… yes.

My name is Erin and I’m a lurker.

Wednesday February 24, 2010

I admit it! I’m an lurker. A constant, avid lurker. This means I scroll through multiple outlets of social media including Twitter, Facebook, and several (dozen?) blogs on a regular basis, but I rarely (if ever) post in response to something, comment, or even @reply. Urban Dictionary has some interesting definitions for it, many of which apply to me.

I’m embarrassed!

I’m one of the only twenty-somethings I know who’s relatively shy about social media and meeting people via the medium of the internet. The weird thing is, this seems a bit off for my generation. I’m old enough to remember the Time Before the Internet but too young to have done much phone conversing with friends as a teen/college student — not when there was the beauty, speed, and simplicity of instant messaging, emails, chats, and social websites. (Though I’m too old to be an avid texter. Texts confuse me, mostly, and I am yet again ashamed to admit that.) So because of this, I have absolutely no qualms about lurking about the internet, checking up on friends and learning about new people.

In real life, however, I’m completely different. I can’t sit in a group of people I vaguely know and stay quiet (or at least, not for long). I’m probably too outgoing, sometimes — in that nerdy-awkward way — and when I describe myself as shy, many people who know me in real life laugh — laugh — because definitionally I’m not shy… except, apparently, when it comes to the internet.

Is this a bad thing, though? Perhaps. I follow and I have a really great sense of many people I’ve never met in real life via the medium, but because I don’t engage in a dialogue, they may not even realize I exist. But I’m also afraid, in this internet age of lower barriers to communication, of coming off as too pushy, crazy, or obsessive. (Which, admittedly, I know I may come off as if I really did throw myself into commenting to my heart’s content.) There’s a happy medium, and I’m sure I’ll ease into finding it, but I haven’t found it yet. Baby steps, they say, and that applies as much to this as to everything. I am trying, and I’ve been trying over the last few months, the last year, to really dig into the internet world. I’ll get there.

But until I ease myself into a more active internet social lifestyle, I’ll probably just keep lurking.

Baby steps. Baby steps.

A rant about the power of compelling writing.

Tuesday February 9, 2010

…and the different emotions and point of view that compelling writing may hopefully illuminate for the consumer.

I live in New York City. I take public transportation. I’ve had more colorful and interesting experiences taking the public transit system here than I did back in Pittsburgh (which was technically my first major solo encounter with public transit), but none of them have lived up to the stereotypical horror stories I heard growing up in the suburbs. Some of my experiences here have been delightfully strange (subway dance routines being the favorite) and some have been plain old creepy (use your imagination, I’m sure it’s close). That’s fine. Sometimes I overhear arguments (always fun!) or one-sided very loud phone conversations (always curiosity-prickling).

But what bothers me — that which makes this a rant — is when I overhear someone’s blatant ignorance, prejudice, misogyny, homophobia, or… well. When people are being offensive (and not quiet about it!), I get annoyed, but when they’re being offensive as a direct result of miseducation, misunderstanding, or a (voiced!) unwillingness to learn… *grumble* I get very mad. Seeing and hearing this kind of thing on TV, on the Internet — that’s expected. But on the bus?

Today it was homophobic in nature. I overheard two teenagers (tenth grade by my guess) talking about being gay in the military and what “being gay” is, by definition, and then how that definition (involving a comparison to a woman) correlated to a gay person’s inability to be an ineffective soldier. (GRRRRR.) One actually asked the other to define “gay” because he didn’t really get what it was. The other teen’s response was so offensive, so misinformed, so casually homophobically ignorant and… I can’t even describe the way it made me feel. As if I’d been punched in the gut, maybe. I’ve heard stories of homophobia, seen blatant homophobia and talked with friends and peers who’ve experienced it first-hand, but never before has it hit me so hard. I’m straight, but that doesn’t change the way it makes me feel. I hated this today. What made this worse was that the teen finished his definition by saying, “That’s what I think it is. I’m pretty sure, like, that’s it.” That actually made me almost turn around and say something — and these were very scary-looking teenagers! (I am easily intimidated) — because I couldn’t believe what he’d just said was, apparently to him, speculation. Loud, ignorant, offensive speculation.

I think before today I might have been a little mistaken in my own assumptions about the prevalence of this kind of thing in the world. I knew it exists, but I didn’t think that knowledge applied to my little corner of the world. Knowing a thing exists outside of my own sphere of experience and experiencing it are two different things, and it took getting my gut metaphorically punched today to remind me of that. Things like this happen every day across the world, and those comments aren’t only about sexual orientation. That ignorance doesn’t only occur in people under the age of 18.

I’ve been told this. Over and over. Statistics, news stories, vague accounts. But I’ve never had a gut-level reaction about casual, callous homophobia/ignorance through any of those “telling” experiences in real life. The only experience I can correlate this with is, honestly, something I read. Someone else’s evocatively-written first-hand account was the closest I’d come before today to feeling that same emotion — and I think that says something, oddly, about the power and necessity of art, of good writing, of fiction and brilliant narrative non-fiction. It has the power to convey profound truths without us having to experience them for ourselves. Today, I did, and that comparison has really hit me hard. That’s what good writing can do.

Good writing has the ability to make us feel things we may not otherwise be in a position to feel, and because of that we are fuller, richer human beings. That old adage, show don’t tell: that’s the beauty of good writing.

Today reminded me, in a very strange and unexpected way, why I write fiction, why I write fantasy; why I consume books and watch movies.

I haven’t experienced a lot of things first hand. In some cases, I may never experience certain things — going to the moon, taking core samples from the icy crust of Antarctica’s Lake Vostok — and for those things I tend to depend on fiction to give me the sense of that realism. To educate me by illustrative, gut-wrenching example. I look to movies like The Hurt Locker to make me feel what it’s like to be under pressure as a bomb specialist in Iraq in 2004. (A recent rental; it’s been on my mind since.) Films like Slumdog Millionaire (which I know surprised a lot of people I know) have an effect when they show you a world you’ve never seen — whether because of lack of experience, travel, or simple knowledge — and by showing you that glimpse, they can affect change. (I’m one of those believers that a change of mind, of heart, can later have a profound impact on the world. Call me an optimist if you must, but I believe that.)

To me, almost more than any other genre, fantasy can’t lose that sense of human connection, the base-level emotions of humanity that bring us together and drive us apart. (Though I’m sure this can apply to science fiction and any other genre in which the world has the capability of being more important than its people.) Fantasy is, like any good fiction, ultimately a mirror of our reality. When I read it, when I write it, I can explore other cultures, worlds, and characters. People I’ll never meet. But they can have a profound influence on the way I view others and the way I view the world. I said earlier today (in a very different context!) that the best fantasy story is one that uses the “genre” to illuminate the differences, possibilities, and promise that exist in our world but by seeing them in a fantastic context they stand out all the more starkly for it. It’s the emotional, “show” connection that gives fantasy, fiction, narrative non-fiction — all good writing, in a sense — its power.

(Okay, this also may be Battlestar Galactica influenced — I’m on Season 2 now, bear with me — and how humanity- and emotional-centric that “science fiction” show is — as it should be.)

No, I’m not going to turn today’s experience into fiction. (A blog entry will do, ha.) I’d be the first person to tell you that I hate preachy books. Doesn’t mean I can’t take that emotion I felt today and work with it, though.

Fiction, at its best, helps to make us feel things our own first hand experience may prevent us from feeling, or to illuminate those things we see every day and don’t appreciate — the list goes on. My take away from today is that as a writer I have the power to show by example and sometimes, in my sheltered little world of a computer screen and daily habits, I need to be reminded that I don’t know everything feels, but what I know, I can share. In turn, I can learn from others.

Maybe one of those teens will see a compelling movie or read an engrossing book — maybe? — that will teach them something, illuminate what they don’t understand. Maybe someone will tell them a compelling story that will get them to see a different point of view. See — because understanding can’t be forced. But seeing is the first crucial step. That is, in essence, what compelling stories ought to do. I hope one day they encounter a story like that.

Sheer terror.

Sunday February 7, 2010

Am I allowed to admit to sheer, stomach-dropping-out-of-shoes terror? Or does that ruin my street cred? (Wait: I had street cred?) All I’ll admit to, in that case, is brain malfunction after overuse. Yes, that will suffice.

I finish finished the work in progress’s final draft today, meaning all of the last niggling edits have been made. The baby is done. Past due to my overly obsessive brain, but there we go. DONE. It even has a title — even though I think it will forever be known in my subconscious by its WiP title. (I hate titling things.) It’s like referring to your friend as Ellie all the time, then someone calls her Elizabeth and your reaction is stunned recognition: Oh, right, that is your whole name, isn’t it? Huh. Just like mytitle. The proper name of a much more casually nicknamed intimate friend.

My brain also hurts from query editing and revising. Holy goats. I haven’t had an assignment so demanding of my mental faculties since my thesis. Condensing tens of thousands of sweat-and-tears words to… two hundred? Less? By golly, it’s near perfect. (Or, well, considering my standards, close enough to do its job. Right? That’s the point; the query isn’t the end, it’s the beginning.)

Speaking of beginnings, I’m going to admit to that terror after all. I’m about to jump off the cliff and query. So many years of writing so many books and this is the first official leap — the first time I’ve wanted to make it, felt it was right enough.

Let’s hope I can fly.

On the topic of celiac disease…

Wednesday February 3, 2010

I have celiac disease. I’ve mentioned it before, here and there, but I’ve never wanted to take the time to talk about it because I considered it something that falls into the category of “personal,” and I don’t talk in detail about my personal life on this blog. I keep thinking about it of late, though, so in this case, I’ll make an exception.

Celiac disease is very common — it’s estimated 1 in 100 people have it — but celiac is also under-diagnosed or mis-diagnosed easily because of its wide array of potential symptoms (or even lack thereof). I came across this article the other day, which got me thinking about the nature of celiac disease and my particular experience with it. The basic part is that I’m living with celiac and it’s not an issue. Am I sad I can’t eat bread? No. Am I sad I can’t eat pasta? I actually love the texture of rice, potato, and corn pastas, especially this rice spaghetti with spinach I found. Delicious. Despite that, do I wish I didn’t have to deal with it? Yes, actually, I wish I didn’t have to deal with it. But I have it, so I deal with it. It’s as simple as that.

I was diagnosed in May 2009 the week after returning from my honeymoon. That was after almost six months of actively seeking an answer from my primary care physician and the gastroenterologist she sent me to see. My discussion with my primary care physician was an off-handed comment made to her in October, when I was in the office suffering from a sinus infection. “I’ve been having some discomfort,” I finally told her. My now-husband, then-fiancé had effectively badgered me into mentioning it to her after nine months of self-medicated lazy solutions that yielded no discernable results and changes in the way I felt.

“For how long?”

“Um. Well, I first noticed it once I moved to New York, after college. So, ah, late 2007, early 2008 maybe. But I assumed it had something to do with my change in diet and lifestyle — the college to grown-up transition. But even in college, I ate healthy foods, worked out regularly. So my routine isn’t that drastically different.”

She talked to me about it. My primary care physician is a lovely, brilliant woman who will listen to my hypochondriac blathering and diagnose me in a snap. She’s a teaching doctor and her office is filled with med students and interns who I’ve witnessed taking notes and asking teacher/student questions while I’m in the room. It’s hilarious. This also means that the questions my doctor asks are ones I never expect and they always seem to lead her directly to the exact answer. Teachers. She said, “You know? I bet it’s IBS. It usually is in a young woman. But I’ve got a friend and he’ll know for sure. I’ll refer you.”

So I went to see her gastroenterologist friend — another teaching doctor affiliated with the same medical school (at NYU). The gastroenterologist ran some tests, did the basic exam, and frowned. My symptoms were not nail-on-the-head anything. “It could be IBS. It probably is.” He frowned, running down the list of notes he’d sketched during my exam. “But maybe not. Let’s monitor this.” He gave me a few over-the-counter treatment options to use regularly for a few weeks. “If that doesn’t work, it will rule a few things out. Call me and make another appointment if that happens.” Naturally, I called and made an appointment four or five weeks later (again, prompted by my over-protective man; I was content to keep complaining and self-medicating). By now, it was February 2009. When my gastroenterologist said that he wanted to take a closer look and run some more complicated tests, I scheduled them for after the wedding, in mid-March. I was too busy to worry about how I was feeling with the wedding to plan.

At the post-wedding appointment in mid-March, I was examined like Katie Couric was, famously, on The Today Show a few years ago. I got to watch myself get examined on a TV screen and I felt kind of ridiculous. I’m too young for this, I kept thinking. But my teaching doctor gastroenterologist lectured me as he examined, and I got to learn far more about the colon than I’d ever known before. The biology geek in me who had once entertained the idea of med school sat there fascinated while the hysterical hypochondriac in me was silently hyperventilating. At the end of that, I was told my colon was filled with very healthy tissue and I most certainly did not have colon cancer. Oh, gee, I thought, colon cancer had been on the table? Really?

I couldn’t schedule a follow-up until May — the office is always booked — and honestly after that, I needed a few weeks’ respite from the gastroenterologist’s office. So it wasn’t colon cancer. It was, as my primary care physician had said months ago, probably just IBS. So I had them draw enough blood to supply an army of vampires for the full battery of tests and made the next appointment.

I didn’t get back in to see the results of the March test until May. My gastroenterologist sat down with me on the Tuesday after I’d returned from our all-you-can-eat Royal Caribbean honeymoon vacation. I was feeling horrible, but I only vaguely mentioned that. He pointed to numbers on my chart, ones that came back with my very complicated blood work he’d sent off the last time I was in the office. “Your numbers say you may have celiac disease,” he said.

I stared at him. Celiac disease, I thought. Like what Elizabeth Hasselbeck on The View has. (No really: that was my first association.) “Oh,” I said aloud. “Really.” My brain didn’t actually process this. My mouth just worked.

“Yes,” he said. My gastroenterologist is a brilliant, scholarly doctor — a teaching doctor. He always speaks in a combination of lecture-speak and an “I assume you already know X and Y, so I’ll begin with Z so we don’t waste time,” kind of manner. He said, “But we can’t know for certain unless we go in and have a look.” Oh, did I know about the going-in-and-having-a-look preference of my teaching doctor doctor. Not that I disagreed — I was an obsessive devotee of ER reruns on TNT for years, so I understood why — but I think in that moment my brain was grappling to find some levity. Not that I was panicking. I just wasn’t actually processing the data correctly. Agreeing with the good doctor was just easier. “I think it’s essential we find out for certain as soon as possible because if this is the cause, there is an easy way for you to start feeling better immediately. How’s tomorrow?” I booked the procedure for the next morning.

I called the requisite worried family members, who by now were all apprised of my quest for an answer, and they were as interested by my half diagnosis as I was. They wished me well and admitted they hoped I didn’t have it. I wasn’t so certain by that point. That night, I hit the internet. All I’d ever known about celiac disease before then had been approximately as much as I knew about, say, pneumonia or kidney stones. I knew what it was, theoretically what the causes and symptoms were, and what it meant for me only in the vaguest of terms. The internet — as you can go look if you Google “celiac disease” provided an inordinate amount of information. But I didn’t look at it too seriously. It was only a half-diagnosis, after all.

The next day, the husband came with — I needed to be sedated, so by law I needed to be escorted from the office; I felt very special. The moment I entered the examination room, the doctor began explaining by saying, “You’ll know it’s celiac the moment you wake up from the sedation because I’ll know the moment I’m in there. Have a seat.”

The thing about having a teaching doctor, I’ve realized, is if you remind them enough of one of their students, they tend to treat you like a student rather than a patient. That was how I’d felt all along — as if rather than reassuring me the patient, he was teaching me the student. It’s comforting for someone who’s spent more of her life as a student than not.

They sedated me. (Which, by the way, is so incredibly freaky. Falling asleep without the falling part, just the sleeping.) The next time I blinked, I looked around the room to see everyone cleaning up. “You have celiac,” the doctor announced. He seemed pleased, as if he’d found the missing piece of that 1,000 piece jigsaw puzzle tucked under the sofa. “I’m so happy because it’s so treatable. You’ll start seeing a change immediately.”

He sat with the husband and I and explained in the most basic terms what celiac was — which I already knew — and what that had meant for my small intestine. He even showed me images he’d printed of my small intestine and the deteriorative damage it had suffered due to my ingesting gluten. (Those images worked like the images of the cancerous lungs they show to kids to keep them from smoking. Holy goats, I didn’t want anything to do with gluten after that.) My specific (and unusual) set of symptoms was what led to the confusion regarding my lengthy diagnosis process. He said roughly 2% of people with celiac exhibit the symptoms I had, which was why it took them so long to rule out other things and pin this one down. The husband, my man whose favorite foods involve pretzels, brioche rolls, Italian hoagies, and fascinating pizzas, was a little horrified. No more wheat, rye, or barley? But that meant no more beer! I smiled in his direction. The marriage was two months old and this was the first big test. How would he handle it? (Remarkably generously, as it turned out.)

I, meanwhile, sat there in the gastroenterologist’s office, blinking as my brain processed this. “I’ve always preferred a salad to a sandwich,” I said. “I like fruit. I hate cupcakes.”

I found I used that explanation a lot over the next days and weeks. People came up to me and gave me their condolences about my “disease” and how they were so sad I wouldn’t be able to eat bread ever again. The older the person, the stranger and more sympathetically depressing the reaction. It was as if I’d told them I’d been diagnosed with one of those life-threatening illnesses with a 98% survival rate. They approached me with a sympathetic apology and overwhelming good cheer half the time. Even my lady doctor startled when I told him. “Oh, really? I’m so sorry. That’s so unfortunate.” I had to resist the urge to snap, “No one has died! Stop grieving over the loss of my intestine’s ability to endure the presence of the gluten protein!” Instead, I said lightly, “I’ve always liked salads.”

The biggest thing for me over the past nine months hasn’t been coping with the loss of foods I can’t eat. When I said I wasn’t a big sandwich person, I meant it. I love sushi and Thai (hold the soy sauce unless it’s gluten-free, though) and I really do love salads. What gets to me is the prevalence of wheat-based foods. The nutritionist I consulted summed it up perfectly: America is a wheat-based society. Whereas China, India, and Japan (and other nations) are largely rice-based societies, Americans go to wheat (and to a lesser extent, corn, which I can eat) for everything. That means wheat products and flour made from wheat are cheap. Thus, wheat flour is often the go-to flour in pretty much every sense in this country. (Wikipedia says, “In the culinary sense, flour is a powder made of cereal grains, other seeds, or roots.” Flour is often synonymous in our culture with “wheat flour,” wherein lies most people’s confusion.) Flour doesn’t only have to come from wheat, though. You can find flours made from rice, corn, bean, quinoa, arrowroot, tapioca and a ton of variations of other starches. But if a recipe of something as innocuous as gravy calls for flour, the chef is going to add wheat flour. It’s just how things go. (There’s also the gluten protein itself, which has some fascinating culinary science applications — i.e. it’s the gluten that gives New York pizza crust its doughy, throw-able springy texture — but that’s another story for a culinary-science-inspired entry.)

In some senses, it’s also hard because I grew up being able to eat gluten, so I am conscious of what I’m missing. If I have a craving for a Pepperidge Farm Milano cookie (which is, cough, distinctive), or an Oreo, I can’t eat it. I’m a texture person, rather than a taste person, so it’s the smooth softness of a classic Madeleine cookie I miss, the chewy crustiness of good New York pizza crust, the bready, soft New York bagel. (Okay, living in New York, home of the best bread in America, doesn’t help, although to its credit, New York is also an amazingly celiac-friendly city.) But it’s not debilitating. I feel bad when I can’t eat food someone has made for a potluck. I hate having to explain the fact that I can’t eat certain things to confused waiters in loud restaurants when I ask if a certain dish has any hidden flour in it (and yes, I take a risk when going to restaurants, but I’m not so affected I can’t trust the kitchens of my neighborhood haunts). Most restaurants in New York I’ve encountered are surprisingly accommodating, friendly, and the waiters are actually knowledgeable. I’ve been told tableside whether or not certain sauces contain flour by waiters who tell me they get the question more often than I’d probably expect. It makes it easier to deal with when I don’t feel so alone, when I have friends who are willing to accommodate me and others who shrug and say, “I’m not a big pasta person anyway.”

Having celiac isn’t like having a peanut allergy, it’s not like being allergic to bell peppers. I’ve explained it to very small children by calling it an allergy — that’s a keyword they know from the cradle, apparently — though when asked to elaborate I do admit it’s “like” an allergy, but it’s not really one. At restaurants I used to say I couldn’t eat bread, which led waiters to look at me as if I was some Atkins Diet fanatic. I quickly turned that into “I’m allergic to wheat,” which is now basically, “I can’t eat wheat, rye, or barley.” (That seems to be easiest at restaurants, rather than having to explain the definition of celiac to a stranger.) For practical purposes, it’s more like being vegetarian or vegan, though with an identifiable medical effect if I “cheat.” And like vegetarianism or veganism, it is,  in my experience, generally recognized. Out of the hundreds of people I’ve had to explain my condition to, only one has actually frowned and said, “I’ve never heard of that.” The overwhelming response of late is, “Really? I know someone with celiac.” When I hear that, I smile.

One in a hundred, I keep thinking. It’s not so bad, as “conditions” go. It’s forced the husband and I to cook more, get more creative, become newly addicted to Food Network. I’ve perfected a fantastic gluten-free scone recipe. (Cranberry walnut is the current favorite variety.) Maybe one day I’ll perfect a gluten-free imitation Milano or Oreo recipe. Sigh. I’ll keep working on it.

Finished?!

Tuesday January 26, 2010

It’s a term that’s always relative, isn’t it? Being “finished” with something — especially for writers. How finished is finished? Even now, a week after I hacked, slashed, and rewrote the final chapter in my Work in Progress, I’m reluctant to say I’m finished. In one definitional sense I am (the edited, cleaned-up, polished rewrite is DONE!), but in others, I’m still working.

Since I “finished” the rewrite, I’ve been looking to cut scenes, unnecessary words and phrases, and redundancy. Thankfully, the slicing has been going well and mercilessly. I will miss a lot but I’m not too concerned about that at this point. After my betas read it, I’ll go through again (hastily! Speedily! Remarkably quickly!) and… well. At that point Things Will Happen. Yes, indeed.

It’s been hard to want to tear myself away from working to even think about blogging. (I apologize for the gap here!) I’ve tried to supplement with occasional Twitter comments, but I even forget to update  (and check) Twitter — and Twitter is Twitter. Even when I stare at the WiP (which is still “in progress” as far as I’m concerned for now) and I don’t want to work on/in it, I still do something else involving writing. I write notes for future projects, I fiddle around with reference documents, I read or re-read something else. I’m no longer in the habit to blog. (Bad Erin!) Then, when I’m not working, I’m catching up on all of the other life essentials I consistently neglect, which is hardly different from anyone else who gets sucked into their work.

(One of said life essentials is now appeasing my husband by watching one episode of Battlestar Galactica a night. His preference would probably be a non-stop marathon, but we’ve compromised. Neither of us has seen BSG and considering I regularly quote Star Wars and we are both unrepentant geeks, watching BSG is one of those “It’s about darned time!” experiences we can no longer avoid. We’re still early in Season One [be dears and don't spoil anything!] and already Starbuck has filled a bit more of the complex, ass-kicking female character void in my soul. That, and where has Tricia Helfer been all of my life?! I am straight and married — but damn.)

The next steps are to finish my last scan of the document, pass it on to the next sets of eyes, then start the business end of things. This isn’t my first novel by any stretch, but it’s the first one I’m going to query. I’m both excited and terrified about that. Now that I have the entirety of the story written in a final form I love (…and tentative sequels mapped? AH!) I am looking forward to 2010 with a bit more enthusiasm and fervor than I did a month ago.

Good things are going to happen. My cheeky optimism says so.

  • a random quote

    Nothing is impossible. Some things are just less likely than others. — Jonathan Winters

  • the latest updates

  • recent blog posts

  • a few random posts

  • blog post categories

  • blog post archives

  • connect with others

  • Widget_logo
  • some feeds I read